Another three character .COM gets hit with a UDRP

I’ve been writing more and more about UDRPs lately, along with the abuse that I think we can all see happening right in front of us. In many cases I see a simple scenario where someone does’t want to spend the money to buy their exact match domain, so they use the UDRP process to get it for pennies on the dollar.

Five and six-figure domains are definite targets and three character .COMs seem to be getting their fair share of the attention. Yesterday shared details about a new UDRP against by a company that currently has their site on

The domain name was sold to the current owner by who does have a history of selling domain names for big bucks so it’s likely that the current owner paid a pretty penny for this domain.

According to the DomainTools Whois History tool, the domain name had been owned by as recently as May of 2017. Knowing a bit about and its domain portfolio as well as some of its publicly known sales, it must have sold for a substantial amount of money. Regardless of its provenance, is a valuable domain name. (Source –

Given that sold for $44,700 two weeks ago it’s safe to say that would likely sell for $50,000+ and could easily sell for six-figures given the wide price range that three character .COMs sell for.

In this case, the current owner of isn’t a domain investor, instead it’s an end-user that bought the domain from to use for a cryptocurrency site:

aex-comI wrote an article early this month asking the question – are six-figure domains a risky investment? I don’t know how much the current owner paid for but like I speculated above, it was probably north of $50,000 and sure, there are probably people out there that would pay six-figures for it.

This UDRP is another great example of the risk domain owners face (investor or not) when they buy high-value domain names. I’ve heard some startup founders say, “well I don’t have to worry since I’m not a domain squatter, this is my one and only domain for my business.”

It doesn’t matter – whether you’re buying the domain as an investment, or as the primary domain for your site, short, valuable domain names like this are prime UDRP targets. Given that UDRPs are still a fairly arbitrary process that often comes down to personal opinion more than legal right this makes domains like a bit scary to own, no matter what your plans are for it.

For me as a domain investor, most of the domains I buy are under $10,000 – heck most are under $5,000 and I sell domains in the $2,500 – $7,500 range on average. I have thought about one day buying a domain for $25,000 – $50,000 that could sell for six-figures, the opportunities are definitely out there.

But for now, I don’t think it’s worth the risk. I’d rather buy 20 domains for $5,000 each or 50 domains for $1,000 each. Less risk and I think in many ways the same or even better/faster ROI. I also think that’s why as an investor, I’d rather deploy capital in that range into things like the stock market and real estate that carry less risk.

I’m a big fan of diversification, and domains are still the primary place I invest my money, but I’ll be staying away from three character .COMs and other short, valuable domains that are a target for the current, broken, UDRP system.

What do you think? Am I being overly dramatic or is this a BIG deal that impacts every single domain investor out there? I want to hear from you – comment and let your voice be heard!

{ 6 comments… add one }

  • Eric Lyon February 20, 2018, 8:24 pm

    It almost sounds as if there are some IP/TM firms approaching large corps to let them know they can meditate on their behalf to get it for a fraction of what the retainer and filing costs are (Which they may not have even thought about prior). Seems like a logical campaign for some firms that are also involved in the domain industry anyway. Or, it could be corporations seeking IP/TM attorneys as you mentioned.

  • Vivek February 20, 2018, 9:11 pm

    There must be some measures a business owner can take to protect their brand? Will an entry into TMCH help?

  • master February 21, 2018, 2:48 am

    the udrp process must oblige attackers to buy all other extensions if they plan to fill the form and to keep them for at least 10 years to mantain the decision active, this will filter 99% of such guys and will remove the middle-man ( law firms that fails to find clients)

  • page howe February 21, 2018, 7:32 am

    well more likely in my opinion, the filer is someone who also inquired, hemmed and hawed, try to offer low, and just always thought, we need a discount, it costs to much………

    then we see the power of one, there is only one – and once its gone, especially in the hands of a real website, its gone.

    so filer went into scramble mode, and realize it was worth $50k and then some one said your only option to to try to Arb-a-steal the name through WIPO, and then they started spending about the same on legal bills and consultants.

    page howe

  • David / Silentptnr February 21, 2018, 7:36 am

    Should be first come first served. With the exception of Trademark infringements. I personally dislike the UDRP process. Should be straight to court in my opinion if a person or business determines a potential trademark violation. Otherwise, first come first served.

  • Anon February 21, 2018, 9:43 am

    If Euronext has a problem with Bit World creating the cryptocurrency exchange under its trademarked AEX banner, then it should be filing a trademark infringement lawsuit, not a lowly UDRP filing. Euronext’s lawyers must be boneheads.


Leave a Comment