Before You Buy a Domain: How to Do Your SEO Due Diligence

Bill's SEO Corner

Note from Morgan: I am very pleased to welcome Bill Hartzer as a new contributing writer for Bill is an SEO guru and a fellow domain geek who will be writing for on a regular basis and sharing some of his SEO wisdom with all of you. I feel incredibly lucky to have Bill onboard, he’s one of the best and I look forward to learning from him alongside all of you! Now onto Bill’s first post…

Generally speaking, I personally buy domain names for two separate reasons. One, as an investment. I buy the domain name because it’s a great name, and I hope to resell it to someone else for a profit at some point. In this first case, I generally don’t intend to develop the domain at all. The other reason I buy a domain name is that I intend to develop it–put content on it and create a great website on it. In that case, I normally do my “SEO Due Diligence” in order to make absolutely sure that there aren’t going to be any problems with marketing the site in the future. If you’re thinking about buying a domain name and using it for any sort of website, this here is how to do SEO due diligence to make sure the domain’s past won’t be an issue in the future.

Before I get into the specifics of how to do SEO due diligence on a domain name, let’s look at recent real-world example of a great domain name–but how the domain’s past eventually hurt a business. Founded in 1929, the Newark Nut Company sells bulk nuts and dried fruits, and in 1999 they moved the company’s focus of selling nuts and fruits via mail order to the web. They established and eventually ran a very successful site. All on the domain name. As a recent NY Times article explains (

While shifting focus to the Internet increased revenue, Mr. Braverman feared that the company’s Web address was holding it back. This suspicion was confirmed for him in 2006, when NutsOnline supplied Jordan almonds to the “Ultimate Wedding Guide” episode of Rachael Ray’s television show. At the end of the show, Ms. Ray mistakenly thanked “” for supplying the almonds.

Oops! Rachael Ray mentioned the site as “” and not “”.

In 2009, Jeffrey Braverman, the original founder’s grandson, tracked down the owner of and negotiated–and eventually bought the domain name. He hired an SEO guy and “cleaned out extraneous and duplicate pages and set up redirects to send NutsOnline visitors to the corresponding pages on Nuts.” He even used Google Webmaster Tools to help him show Google that the site was moving to a new location. He then flipped the switch and the traffic took a huge dive. Not for a short period of time, but for a long period of time. Turns out that Jeffrey Braverman didn’t do his SEO due diligence on the domain. Here’s where it gets very interesting:

Matt Cutts weighed in on the case later (

“Matt Cutts, chief of Google’s Webspam team, said in an interview that, because Google’s algorithms have to adjust to a new address, sites should expect a temporary drop in traffic immediately after a move, maybe 5 percent. According to Mr. Cutts, Mr. Braverman missed three opportunities to minimize his traffic loss. First, had been a parked or content-free site before the sale, meaning, Mr. Cutts said, that NutsOnline basically moved into what was an abandoned building for the last 10 years. To prepare users (and Google) for the site’s new purpose, Mr. Cutts said, Mr. Braverman should have put up a banner or a simplified site on to announce its new identity several months before moving…

Second, NutsOnline should have moved a small part of the site (a subdirectory or subdomain) to the new address for a month or so before the move to test for problems…

And, third, because had previously gotten much of its traffic from Britain (because of the similarity of its name to that of a British men’s magazine), Mr. Braverman’s team should have done more to set the geographic location of the site…”

So, according to Matt, the best way to move your site to a new domain is to:

  • prepare users, and Google, for the site’s new purpose. Don’t park the domain, but put up actual content explaining the new location.
  • only move part of the site, a subdirectory or subdomain to the new address.
  • set the geo location of the domain (specific to the case, because it was the name of a British men’s magazine).

There are several things that I personally do before I buy a domain, especially if I’m going to develop a site on it. By doing all of these different things, you may uncover the site’s past and it’s current state. After each task, I’ve included some notes about it and why you would want to do that task. All are important, and not necessarily listed in any particular order. In this example, I’m using the domain name “”.

  • Search for the domain name in Google like this: – as you can see, the domain name is listed. If the domain name is in the Google index, and shows up, that’s good. Look at the search results. Are there any red flags? Any weird search results that may indicate the site was up and running and had content on it–and has links from other websites? Other websites may rank for the domain name. If they’re on topic (apartment related) then that’s fine. If not, there may be an issue. You’ll want on-topic links in the future, so any off-topic links you’ll need to get rid of later on. Might take a lot of time to clean up links if you are going to do any SEO later on.
  • Search for the domain name in quotes in Google. Again, looking for any off-topic websites linking or mentioning this domain name.
  • Search for the site in Take a look and see if the domain previously had content on it and what type of content was on it. If it was a live website, then the content should be on the same topic as the keywords in the domain–or what you plan on using it for. If it was a parked domain, then you may need to immediately put your own content on it for at least a month or two in order to get it back into Google’s “good graces” so to speak. Google doesn’t like parked domains and think they are spam. So, put content on it right away (anything, even a blank page with a banner ad–something).
  • Check the whois history. Domain Tools can give you that data. See how many people have owned it, if it has changed hands a lot or just a few times. I would prefer to have a domain that didn’t change hands a lot–and was never owned by a “domainer”, especially if I was going to develop the site.
  • Check the backlinks on the domain. Here’s something that is very critical. Go to and check the links. Look at the historical data and see what types of links were there, who is current linking, and how they are linking (what anchor text they’re using to link to the site). Hopefully the links aren’t from “bad websites”, low quality sites like article websites or article directories, or even off-topic websites. For more due diligence, even go to and run one of their “link detox” reports on the domain name. You’ll have to pay for that data, but you’ll know if the site has toxic (bad) links pointing to the domain name or not.

In the case of, I wouldn’t buy that domain name and develop it. The previous owner had built a lot of low quality “article type” of links to the website and those will either have to get removed (difficult) or you’ll have to end up “disavowing” those links with both Google and in order to get rid of them. The site may have some difficulty ranking well for “Dallas Luxury Apartments” based on this history. In this case, I would rather start fresh with a domain name that has no history whatsoever than have to deal with low quality links pointing to a domain name.

If you’re going to buy a domain and develop it, you absolutely owe it to yourself to do your SEO due diligence on the domain. Check the history, check the backlinks, and see who owned it previously. The reputation of a domain name can help or hurt a website when it comes to SEO and it’s potential for ranking well in organic search in the future.

Bill Hartzer

Bill Hartzer is a search engine optimization consultant that specialized in highly technical SEO Audits and link audits of websites. Bill is a frequent speaker and expert discussion panel participant at various search engine marketing and internet marketing conferences and events such as the Search Engine Strategies and PubCon Conferences, and was the Keynote Speaker at a recent domain conference. Follow him on Twitter or on Google+.

{ 16 comments… add one }

  • Aaron Strong June 3, 2013, 2:06 pm

    I would prefer to have a domain that didn’t change hands a lot–and was never owned by a “domainer”,

    I don’t even know where to start with that statement. Please explain your definition of a domainer. Is Linton Investments considered a domainer?

  • Joe June 3, 2013, 2:11 pm

    Hello Bill,
    You say in the above post that ‘Google doesn’t like parked domains and think they are spam.’ So what would you suggest to do with domains that one doesn’t plan to develop, but as an investment to sell in the future? As an investor we dont want the investment to lose value and dont want to build a second grade website. Please give your response with an example site.
    Thanks in advance.

  • Aaron June 3, 2013, 2:21 pm

    Hey Bill –
    Great article and congrats on your new position.
    I was going to the link in the article but it took me to, just a heads up.
    Thank you again for the pointers, I look forward to reading more!
    Respectfully –

  • Bill Hartzer June 3, 2013, 3:16 pm

    Joe, I should probably clarify that a bit. Google doesn’t like parked domains–so they don’t usually include them in their index. If you plan on developing it and getting the full SEO value, it will have to be “not parked” for a period of time before it’s indexed again. I would give it at least 6 months, shorter if there’s a lot of marketing done, such as building links.

    As for an example, anything on the site that is not a parked page–even a white page with one or two words on it would work. Typically, the ones that work well that I like are something with a logo along with a sentence or two about the upcoming website: along with a signup form to be notified when the site launches.

  • Bill Hartzer June 3, 2013, 3:29 pm

    >> Please explain your definition of a domainer.
    Aaron, when it comes to domains, I usually look at the history. If the domain name changed hands a lot (I would say over 10 times) and the domain *ONLY* was parked over and over again, then that may not be as good as a domain that had a “live site” on it for several years and didn’t change hands over and over again.

  • Aaron Strong June 3, 2013, 3:36 pm

    Why would you not want a domain from a “domainer”? Are you a “domainer. “? Have you sold domains to “domainer’s”?
    If all business’s take your advice and not buy a domain from a “domainer” all of our domains would become worthless. I see no reason for the negative publicity on a domain forum that I arrived from Domaining(dot)com. This talk is bad for a legitimate industry trying to gain acceptance. If won’t buy from a domainer, please don’t preach to them.

  • Bill Hartzer June 3, 2013, 3:43 pm

    I think there may be some confusion here. If I’m looking for a domain that I want to develop and spend a bunch of time marketing the site and driving traffic to it, I want to look for a domain that hasn’t had anything “excessive” done to it in the past. I would be suspicious that there’s “something up” if the domain changed hands a number of times–just like I would if there were an excessive amount of links pointing to the domain.

    It’s all about the “excessive” part of it–not merely the fact that it was owned by a domainer. If one domainer owned the domain for several years, that’s a good thing.

  • Raymond Hackney June 3, 2013, 3:56 pm

    Welcome to the team Bill.

  • Aaron Strong June 3, 2013, 4:05 pm

    I would prefer to have a domain that didn’t change hands a lot–and was never owned by a “domainer”, especially if I was going to develop the site

    Bill, the above quote was taken from the post. I just hope in the future we see more to promote domains and not treat “domainers” as if their property is a meth lab.

  • Deano June 3, 2013, 4:06 pm

    Is Aaron Strong really Adam Strong ? Nice article Bill.

  • Aaron Strong June 3, 2013, 4:18 pm

    No. We are not the same. I have also seen several Aaron’s in the domain industry, so I use my full name on all posts. Thanks for clarifying this for their sake. Lol

  • Joe June 3, 2013, 4:47 pm

    Hi Bill!
    I really liked your post, thanks for what you provide Seo their years of experience is a degree to consider.
    I be a domainers, but when negative ripple of a domain name will have my own web development or web template domain parking. Already a new record every purchase you make all not have been anyone else everyone is alright web project when the keyword. No other domainers buy domains or auctions that have traffic, for a good comment, read his post that this lead to problems in the long run with Google.
    One question, Bill as Seo first experience tell me be true as selling many in the organic results of Google?
    Thanks Bill,
    Thanks also to Morgan for always thinking of us.

  • owen frager June 3, 2013, 5:24 pm

    If google hates parked domains so much why don’t they just refund the twenty percent of their bottom line they are directly responsible for?

  • Chris June 5, 2013, 11:16 pm

    Hi bill how much do you normally charge for seo, pls email me



  • lunares y verrugas October 30, 2013, 11:03 pm

    Greetings! Very useful advice within this article!

    It’s the little changes that produce the biggest
    changes. Thanks for sharing!


Leave a Comment